LangChain vs LlamaIndex
A detailed comparison to help you choose the right tool for your use case.
LangChain
FrameworkThe most popular framework for building LLM-powered applications
LlamaIndex
FrameworkData framework for connecting custom data sources to LLMs
LangChain
Strengths
- Massive ecosystem & integrations
- Comprehensive documentation
- Active community
Limitations
- Heavy abstraction layer
- Breaking changes between versions
- Can be overkill for simple use cases
LlamaIndex
Strengths
- Best-in-class data ingestion
- Excellent RAG capabilities
- Clean API design
Limitations
- Less flexible for non-RAG use cases
- Smaller agent ecosystem
- Python-first
Verdict
LangChain is better for complex agent systems and diverse LLM workflows. LlamaIndex wins for RAG-focused applications and data-heavy use cases. Many teams use both together.
More Comparisons
CrewAI vs AutoGen
CrewAI is simpler and better for production role-based workflows. AutoGen is more powerful for complex multi-agent conversations and research. Choose CrewAI for speed to production, AutoGen for flexibility.
Pinecone vs Weaviate
Pinecone is best for teams wanting fully managed simplicity with no ops overhead. Weaviate wins for teams needing open-source flexibility, hybrid search, and self-hosting control.
LangChain vs CrewAI
LangChain is a comprehensive LLM framework with agent capabilities. CrewAI is purpose-built for multi-agent orchestration. Use LangChain for general LLM apps, CrewAI for dedicated multi-agent workflows (it uses LangChain under the hood).
AutoGPT vs MetaGPT
AutoGPT is better for general-purpose autonomous tasks with its plugin ecosystem. MetaGPT excels at structured software development with its company-simulation approach. Choose based on your use case.